The good thing about AMD’s 6000 series is that you are always in for a tremendous surprise. Take the 6600 XT GPU, for example. This graphics card never shies away from competition and has been the first and only competitor for Nvidia’s mid-rangers with a classic twist on its affordable value.
The RX 6600 XT is an outstanding 1080p-focused mid-end gaming graphics card that presents itself as a worth-considering option in this highly saturated market of gaming GPUs. With satiating features, the RX 6600 XT boasts ample GDDR6 memory, highly-optimized/enhanced RDNA 2 microarchitecture, and up to 2600 MHz clock speeds.
Not only that, it’s over 2K streaming processors, and 32 compute plus raytracing cores are intelligently fine-tuned to work at these speeds. It achieves all this with a very low-end-like power consumption of only 160W. But with all the goodness, it still lacks in a relative sense.
Although not decision-altering, its compromises still require some alternative options for those explicitly looking for good raytracing and AI efficiency. Hence, we will survey other cards that hopefully provide the same perks without the compromises.
GPU equivalent to the RX 6600 XT
The RTX 3060 and RTX 2060 Super are the most similar matches for the RX 6600 XT. The performance margins of these GPUs are roughly identical, with some exceptions here and there. The neat feature of all these GPUs is that they all include a contemporary generation of cores and memory types, making their performances easily comparable. Let’s see what the 3060 and 2060 Super offer in light of RX 6600 XT’s specs.
PNY RTX 3060 UPRISING
The RTX 3060 is our first choice as an alternative to the RX 6600 XT. Its cutting-edge design, architecture, memory, and core count make it the best mid-ranger with decent raytracing. It uses the legendary Ampere microarchitecture that has been the base of many immensely popular Nvidia GPUs.
The 3060 has two variants with 8GB and 12GB memory. Both are essentially similar in performance, with one having an extra edge of memory. With that cleared, the RTX 3060 uses GDDR6 memory and has bandwidths of 360 GB/s. Its frequency is also pretty suitable for a mid-end card and works in a 1.3 – 1.77 GHz range. Also, 3060 is graced generously by over 3.5K CUDA, 112 Tensor, and 28 RT cores.
These cores allow it to be an incredible raytracing machine with unadulterated gaming output for 1080p graphics. Relative to the 6600 XT, its raytracing and above 1080p performance display a slight improvement, but overall, it is nearly identical.
| Feature | PNY RTX 3060 UPRISING | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Core Clock (MHz) | 1825 MHz | 1968 MHz |
| Boost Clock (MHz) | 2250 MHz | 2589 MHz |
| CUDA Cores | 5120 | 2048 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size (GB) | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width (bits) | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed (Gbps) | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
| TDP (Watts) | 300 W | 160 W |
| DirectX Version | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenGL Version | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| VR Ready | Yes | - |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 80 | 32 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Price | $999.99-$2599.99 | $275 |
Inno3D RTX 2060 Super Gaming
Hailing from a pre-Covid era, the RTX 2060 Super was the best 1080p card for quite some time. The 2060 Super is an aged option for today’s gaming builds, but it still executes Full HD gaming performance like nobody’s business.
Since it’s a 2019 RTX GPU, it utilizes the Turing microarchitecture and a GDDR6 256-bit 8 Gigabyte memory. The higher bit memory benefits from an astonishing 448 GB per second bandwidth. It also has satisfactory cores with over 2000 CUDA cores, 272 Tensor engines, and 34 ray units.
Its inclusive efficacy is very close to the 6600 XT. However, it lacks streamlining in core-specific tasks because it houses the first and second-generation RT and tensor units. It is still an excellent choice for budget gamers and runs sufficiently to endorse a consideration.
| Feature | Inno3D RTX 2060 Super Gaming | AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Core Clock (MHz) | 1470 MHz | 1968 MHz |
| Boost Clock (MHz) | 1695 MHz (+3%) | 2589 MHz |
| CUDA Cores | 2176 | 2048 |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Size (GB) | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Bus Width (bits) | 256 bit | 128 bit |
| Memory Speed (Gbps) | 1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective |
| TDP (Watts) | 175 W | 160 W |
| DirectX Version | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenGL Version | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| VR Ready | - | - |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 34 | 32 |
| Ports | 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | 1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| Price | $39342 | $275 |
Conclusion
The RX 6600 XT is an exquisite and innovative card with copious aptitude. It is among the best, if not the best, value-providing GPUs of the present gaming component market. The amalgam of substantial raw performance with optimal core utilization and considerate power draw is pretty self-evident.
The power draw and efficiency of the 6600 XT are really something to be admired. If it wasn’t for AMD, getting a graphics card like this at this value would have been impossible. But the things that this card suffers from might expel it from some consumers list who want an explicit gaming experience. This is where Nvidia’s products excel.
With this information, you are fully equipped to make your next gaming experience truthful to your desires.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is RX 6600 XT suitable for 1440p gaming?
RX 6600 XT has an excellent 1440p gaming output because of its over-the-top 8GB VRAM and overall outstanding mid-end stats. However, you might get diminishing returns on any 300 – 400$ mid-range GPUs as they are purposefully made for extreme 1080p with only so much headroom for 2K or 4K.
How good is the RX 6600 XT at raytracing?
Its raytracing is decent or satisfactory, but there is nothing to brag about. Although AMD has been trying to keep up with the competition, and their newer entries have incremental RT cores, their optimization is still not at the level of RTX cards.
